
## Table of Contents

1. [Introduction](#introduction)
2. [Combining Font Requests](#combining-font-requests)
3. [Conclusion](#conclusion)

## Introduction

If your page needs more than one Google font, instead of making multiple requests, you can try using `|` to separate them into a single request.

## Combining Font Requests

```





```

```
A example of how to request google fonts in once.


```

## Conclusion

By using the `|` character, you can combine multiple Google Fonts into a single HTTP request, reducing the number of network calls and improving page load performance.


If your page needs more than one Google font, instead of making multiple requests, you can combine them into one using the pipe character.

How to Load Multiple Google Fonts into One Single Request


## Table of Contents

1. [Only Showing Play Icon for YouTube Video](#only-showing-play-icon-for-youtube-video)
2. [Vimeo Video](#vimeo-video)
3. [Load YouTube iFrame from JavaScript](#load-youtube-iframe-from-javascript)

## Introduction

This post covers a few tips for embedding videos from YouTube and Vimeo on your website, including customizing the player appearance and loading the YouTube iFrame via JavaScript.

## Only Showing Play Icon for YouTube Video

If you don't like YouTube's default settings such as the title and YouTube mark, just append the following parameters to your YouTube URL and your embedded YouTube video will look like the following.

`?showinfo=0&color=white&autohide=1`

```
http://www.youtube.com/embed/9tzyJEwO9Os?showinfo=0&color=white&autohide=1
```

If you want to check the rest of the parameters, visit the YouTube Embedded Players and Player Parameters documentation.

## Vimeo Video

Following is another video site, Vimeo's default view. A good thing about Vimeo is that you can easily change the play icon color like the following.

```

```

## Load YouTube iFrame from JavaScript

From
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18220209/load-youtube-video-listen-to-onplayerstatechange

```
// Load API asynchronously.
var tag = document.createElement('script');
tag.src = "https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api";
var firstScriptTag = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
firstScriptTag.parentNode.insertBefore(tag, firstScriptTag);
var player;
function onYouTubeIframeAPIReady() {
    player = new YT.Player('player', {
        height: '220',
        width: '300',
        videoId: '9tzyJEwO9Os',
        playerVars: {'showinfo': 0, 'color': 'white', 'autohide': 1},
        events: {'onStateChange': onPlayerStateChange}
    });
}

function onPlayerStateChange(event) {
    if(event.data === 0) {
        hideVideo();
    }
}

$("#link").click(function(){
    $('#player').show(); // show player
    player.playVideo(); // begin playback
});
```

## Conclusion

Embedding videos on your site is straightforward. YouTube allows you to customize the player appearance with URL parameters, Vimeo offers easy icon color changes, and you can also load the YouTube iFrame dynamically via JavaScript for more control over player behavior.


A few tips for embedding video on your site

How to Embed Video on Your Site


## Table of Contents

1. [Introduction](#introduction)
2. [Responsive Testing Tools](#responsive-testing-tools)
3. [Conclusion](#conclusion)

## Introduction

Here are 11 useful tools and resources for testing responsive UI across different devices and screen sizes.

## Responsive Testing Tools

1. [http://www.browserstack.com/responsive](http://www.browserstack.com/responsive)

Best tool! Lots of variety in the testing environment. Although you have to pay, it's worth it.

2. http://www.studiopress.com/responsive/

3. http://responsivetest.net/

4. http://responsivedesignchecker.com/

5. http://lab.maltewassermann.com/viewport-resizer/

6. http://quirktools.com/screenfly/

7. 10 Helpful Resources for Testing Responsive Web Design

8. http://responsive.is/

9. Chrome Extension: Responsive Web Design Tester

10. 50 Useful Responsive Web Design Tools For Designers

11. Responsive Resources

## Conclusion

There are many tools available for testing responsive web design. BrowserStack stands out as one of the best options with its wide variety of testing environments. Choose the tool that best fits your needs and budget to ensure your website looks great on all devices.


A collection of useful tools and links for testing responsive web design across different devices and screen sizes.

Few Useful Links About How to Test Responsive UI


## Table of Contents

1. [Introduction](#introduction)
2. [Bootstrap-Based Frameworks](#bootstrap-based-frameworks)
3. [Other CSS Frameworks](#other-css-frameworks)
4. [Other Resources](#other-resources)
5. [Conclusion](#conclusion)

## Introduction

If you want to make your website responsive for all devices, like mobile and tablet, the short answer is "it depends." However, in general, there are two approaches:

1. Create responsive UI by using a responsive UI framework

2. Create individual mobile or tablet apps

If you have money or time, you could do both: modify your website's UI to be responsive for other devices, and additionally create apps for individual devices. Responsive UI doesn't require as much time and money compared to creating a mobile app. However, responsive UI is not optimized for specific devices, so many device-specific functions can't be used. That's the advantage of creating a mobile app — however, it takes more time.

This blog lists a few UI framework options for creating responsive UI for your website:

1. Create your own CSS and JavaScript framework

2. Use Bootstrap, a popular responsive UI framework

3. Use another responsive UI framework

## Bootstrap-Based Frameworks

### Flatstrap

http://www.flatstrap.org/download.html

A flat style based on Bootstrap.

![](https://d1p0mp3f1fx0hz.cloudfront.net/_f4eba7pav.png)

### Bootswatch

http://bootswatch.com/

This site has dozens of different Bootstrap styles. The change is just replacing your Bootstrap.css.

![](http://res.cloudinary.com/dmwrakaup/image/upload/v1413220066/nja1ygbsxvahnfz1fwrs.png)

One example of Bootswatch's flat style menu bar:

![](https://d1p0mp3f1fx0hz.cloudfront.net/_oltqlurha.png)

### WrapBootstrap

https://wrapbootstrap.com/tag/mobile

This site has lots of different styles for many purposes, all based on the Bootstrap CSS framework.

![](http://res.cloudinary.com/dmwrakaup/image/upload/v1413220067/g3paqqdvxrnznxkxqgix.png)

One example from WrapBootstrap about a menu bar:

http://wrapbootstrap.com/preview/WB02495S4

![](https://d1p0mp3f1fx0hz.cloudfront.net/_a88ki5fta.png)

## Other CSS Frameworks

If you want to try another CSS framework, there are many out there. But that will be a big change since you'll be replacing the existing Bootstrap CSS framework.

http://mashable.com/2013/04/26/css-boilerplates-frameworks/

### Foundation

http://foundation.zurb.com/

![](http://res.cloudinary.com/dmwrakaup/image/upload/v1413220067/zvoarpp26r4fnuaybser.png)

### Gumby

http://gumbyframework.com/

![](http://res.cloudinary.com/dmwrakaup/image/upload/v1413220067/mrqyizllzquaq4d89usw.png)

## Other Resources

### Responsive CSS Framework Comparison

http://responsive.vermilion.com/compare.php

## Conclusion

There are many responsive UI frameworks available, ranging from Bootstrap-based themes like Flatstrap, Bootswatch, and WrapBootstrap to alternative frameworks like Foundation and Gumby. Choose the one that best fits your project's needs and design requirements.


A list of responsive web UI frameworks and resources to help you choose the right CSS framework for making your website responsive.

Few Useful Links for Responsive Web UI Frameworks


## Table of Contents

1. [Introduction](#introduction)
2. [Popular Intranet Platforms](#popular-intranet-platforms)
3. [Pantheon Platform Deep Dive](#pantheon-platform-deep-dive)
4. [Orchard CMS Overview](#orchard-cms-overview)
5. [Comparative Analysis](#comparative-analysis)
6. [Conclusion](#conclusion)

## Introduction

Every company needs a backend-office system—whether it's an SCM (Supply Chain Management), ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), or general intranet solution. Rather than building everything from scratch, leveraging existing platforms can save significant time and resources.

This guide provides a curated list of intranet platforms with various capabilities, tech stacks, and pricing models. You can choose to build custom solutions or start with pre-existing frameworks and customize them to fit your needs.

## Popular Intranet Platforms

Below is a comprehensive list of 13 popular platforms for building intranet applications:

### PHP-Based Solutions

1. **[ExoPlatform](http://www.exoplatform.com/)** - PHP
2. **[OpenAtrium](http://openatrium.com/#!/)** - PHP
3. **[Pantheon](https://www.getpantheon.com/)** - PHP (Hosted)
4. **[Acquia Drupal 7](http://www.acquia.com/Drupal-7)** - PHP

### ASP.NET Solutions

5. **[Composite C1](http://www.composite.net/)** - ASP.NET Razor, Web Forms, MVC
6. **[BetterCMS](http://www.bettercms.com/)** - ASP.NET MVC Platform
7. **[Kentico](http://www.kentico.com/)** - ASP.NET Platform
8. **[LeMoon](http://www.lemoon.com/)** - ASP.NET Platform
9. **[MojoPortal](https://www.mojoportal.com/)** - ASP.NET (Blogs, Forums, Calendar, Newsletter, Maps, eCommerce)
10. **[MonoX](http://monox.mono-software.com)** - ASP.NET CMS and Social Networking Platform
11. **[Orchard CMS](http://www.orchardproject.net/)** - ASP.NET MVC (Open Source)
12. **[Virto Commerce](http://virtocommerce.com/)** - .NET 4.5 (MVC, IoC, Entity Framework, Azure)

### Enterprise Solutions

13. **[SharePoint Online](http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/)** - Microsoft

## Pantheon Platform Deep Dive

If you're starting a new system and want flexibility to customize while supporting multiple programming languages, **[Pantheon](https://dashboard.getpantheon.com/)** is highly recommended.

### Key Features

- **Foundation**: Built on open-source OpenAtrium with essential modules for login, security, role management, and content management
- **Free Tier**: Try it out at no cost
- **Multi-Environment Support**: Development (DEV), Testing (TEST), and Production (PROD) environments
- **Deployment Options**: Deploy code via SFTP or Git
- **Data Management**: Export databases and files easily
- **Infrastructure**: No need to manage web servers yourself

### Why Choose Pantheon?

Pantheon accelerates development by handling infrastructure management while allowing you to focus on building features. If budget allows, you can launch quickly and manage an admin panel without extensive DevOps work.

> **Technology Stack**: PHP-based with integrated hosting

### Development Workflow Visualization

Pantheon provides a streamlined workflow across multiple environments:

![Pantheon DEV, TEST, PROD Environment](https://res.cloudinary.com/dmwrakaup/image/upload/v1409270535/esncffv6vvtpqat6mgsz.png)

## Orchard CMS Overview

**[Orchard](http://www.orchardproject.net/)** is an excellent choice for building intranet applications using the Microsoft tech stack.

### Technology Stack

- **Language**: C#
- **Framework**: ASP.NET MVC
- **Open Source**: Free to use and modify

### Strengths

- Similar architecture to OpenAtrium but with .NET ecosystem advantages
- Strong integration with Windows server environments
- Modular plugin architecture
- Extensive theming capabilities

### Considerations

- Requires hosting on your own infrastructure
- Learning curve if unfamiliar with ASP.NET MVC
- Development and deployment setup required

## Comparative Analysis

The following table compares three major platforms across key dimensions:

| Feature              | OpenAtrium            | Pantheon              | SharePoint Online                                | Orchard CMS        |
| -------------------- | --------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ------------------ |
| **Language**         | PHP + Apache          | PHP + Apache          | Microsoft                                        | C# ASP.NET MVC     |
| **Features**         | Source code + modules | Hosted OpenAtrium     | Social, Content Mgmt, Workflows, Work Management | Content Management |
| **Setup Complexity** | High (DIY)            | Low (Managed Hosting) | Low (SaaS)                                       | Medium (DIY)       |
| **Customization**    | Very Flexible         | Very Flexible         | Limited                                          | Very Flexible      |
| **Infrastructure**   | Self-hosted           | Managed               | Cloud-hosted                                     | Self-hosted        |
| **Price**            | Free                  | Pay-per-use           | $5+/user/month                                   | Free (base)        |

### Pros & Cons Breakdown

#### OpenAtrium

**Pros:**

- Excellent UI out of the box
- Extensive feature set
- Large community support
- PHP—most widely used web language
- Full application lifecycle management
- Completely free

**Cons:**

- Requires setup of entire development environment
- Infrastructure and server management needed
- Database and file management responsibility
- Longer deployment learning curve

#### Pantheon

**Pros:**

- All OpenAtrium advantages included
- Pre-configured DEV, TEST, PROD environments
- Ready-to-deploy hosting
- Git-based workflow integration
- Minimal infrastructure management

**Cons:**

- Requires subscription payment
- Limited free tier (3 sites)
- Vendor lock-in to Pantheon platform

#### SharePoint 2013 (On-Premises)

**Pros:**

- Rich customization capabilities
- Enterprise-grade features
- Extensive integration ecosystem

**Cons:**

- Requires dedicated server setup
- Expensive licensing costs
- Complex initial deployment
- Significant IT resources needed

#### SharePoint Online

**Pros:**

- Managed cloud service
- No server maintenance required
- Microsoft support included

**Cons:**

- High per-user costs ($5+/month minimum)
- Limited customization options
- Less flexibility for complex workflows

#### Orchard CMS

**Pros:**

- Clean architecture (similar to OpenAtrium)
- ASP.NET ecosystem integration
- Open source
- Modern C# language features

**Cons:**

- Requires self-hosting
- Smaller community than OpenAtrium
- Some advanced modules require payment

## Choosing the Right Platform

### For Maximum Flexibility with Minimal Cost

**Choose: OpenAtrium**

- Best if you have in-house development resources
- Ideal for teams comfortable with infrastructure management

### For Rapid Deployment

**Choose: Pantheon**

- Best for teams wanting to launch quickly
- Ideal when you want managed hosting with customization

### For Enterprise Environments

**Choose: SharePoint**

- Best for large organizations with existing Microsoft infrastructure
- Ideal when integration with Office 365 is needed

### For .NET-Based Development

**Choose: Orchard CMS**

- Best for teams with C# expertise
- Ideal when you want open-source with .NET power

## Conclusion

The choice of intranet platform depends on several factors:

1. **Budget**: From free (OpenAtrium, Orchard) to enterprise licensing (SharePoint)
2. **Technical Resources**: DIY platforms vs. managed hosting solutions
3. **Tech Stack**: PHP, .NET, or cloud-native preference
4. **Timeline**: Quick launch vs. custom-built solutions
5. **Scalability Needs**: From small teams to enterprise organizations

There are numerous options available for building intranet systems. The comparison table above highlights the key differences between popular choices like OpenAtrium, Pantheon, and Orchard CMS. Consider your team's technical expertise, budget constraints, and long-term maintenance capabilities when making your decision.

**Key Takeaway**: Rather than starting from scratch, leveraging an existing platform with a strong community and proven track record will save you months of development time.


A comprehensive guide to choosing the right backend office system for your company. Compare open-source solutions like OpenAtrium and Orchard with enterprise options like SharePoint.

Web

How to Load Multiple Google Fonts into One Single Request

How to Embed Video on Your Site

Few Useful Links About How to Test Responsive UI

Few Useful Links for Responsive Web UI Frameworks

13 Intranet Applications for Backend Office Systems